The best Side of case law 395 ppc acquittal
The best Side of case law 395 ppc acquittal
Blog Article
The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
However, In the event the same person were charged with section three hundred and 302, their defence that they never intended to eliminate the person – and that They simply planned to injure them or incapacitate them –, will fail, since the elements on the offence only need the intent to cause injury to get proven, not the intention to cause death.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to really make it ideal to your facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified with the decision with the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
maintaining the conviction awarded towards the appellant reduce the sentence of your appellant from imprisonment for life to at least one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of the grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to become designed.
6. Mere involvement inside of a heinous offence is no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled with the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, given that then He's powering the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation click here qua him is complete, his person isn't any more demanded for further investigation, therefore, his constant incarceration would not provide any advantageous purpose at this stage.
Online access on the case management system for that Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases can be searched using name or case number.
VI) The petitioner is driving the bars because arrest, investigation on the case is complete, he is no more necessary for that purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him driving the bars before summary of trial will serve no valuable purpose.
Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration by the Court under Article 184 (three), has long been setting a precedent which allows for much easier access towards the public to approach the superior courts and also the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
10. Without touching the merits of the case of the issue of once-a-year increases within the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, this sort of once-a-year increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to become made by the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and shell out fixation usually are not entertainable for your reasons that these matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, along with the legal grounds for this petition are inadequate as a result this petition is dismissed, which entails disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court will not be within a position to dilate upon these disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
competent authority has determined the eligibility of the private respondents and found them to get in good shape for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)